<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home Information Packs aka HIPs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://propertyknow.com/uk-property/home-information-packs-aka-hips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://propertyknow.com/uk-property/home-information-packs-aka-hips/</link>
	<description>UK Property Market Information - www.PropertyKnow.com</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Large</title>
		<link>http://propertyknow.com/uk-property/home-information-packs-aka-hips/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Large</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rentahomemanchester.co.uk/2006/11/09/home-information-packs-aka-hips/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>This article is seriously misleading in several respects.
There is &#38; will be no such thing as a "HIPs report"
A Home Information Pack (HIP) will need to contain the legal information about the title, local authority searches (all already required to be obtained) &#38; an energy performance certificate.
It can also contain a Home Condition Report (HCR) and other documents such as environmental searches &#38; answers to the normal enquiries raised by a buyer. The HCR was to be mandatory but, due to concerns about there being enough qualified Home Inspectors as at 1 June 2007, this requirement was removed, though may be reinstated if the market led take up of HCRs is unsatisfactory for it to be a universally adopted part of the process.

The HIP, without a HCR, is very rarely likely to cost as much as £650, probably more like £400 in most cases &#38; this is all money that would need to be spent if it were the buyer getting the information together, after they had agreed to buy. And which would be wasted if they are unable to proceed for any reason (such as the chain of sales collapsing). The HIP does not have to be updated or "reassessed" every 3-6 months. The only requirement at the moment is that lenders require local searches to be no more than 3 months old, nothing else. This may remain the case but in future, updating searches if they are older will become very easy &#38; cheap through the electronic processes which will be available.

The concept of the HIP is plain common sense - when a transaction is usually part of a chain, it makes sense to remove as many pitfalls as possible from the process, by having the information up front. Far from being a deterrent to a seller, it should be seen as a valuable marketing tool the cost of which is saved on their related purchase &#38; which may save them a vast amount of hassle &#38; trauma, let alone possibly saving the whole chain from collapse. In the context of the overall costs of sale &#38; purchase, the need to commit to this relatively small cost, which you pay anyway on your purchase at present, is almost irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is seriously misleading in several respects.<br />
There is &amp; will be no such thing as a &#8220;HIPs report&#8221;<br />
A Home Information Pack (HIP) will need to contain the legal information about the title, local authority searches (all already required to be obtained) &amp; an energy performance certificate.<br />
It can also contain a Home Condition Report (HCR) and other documents such as environmental searches &amp; answers to the normal enquiries raised by a buyer. The HCR was to be mandatory but, due to concerns about there being enough qualified Home Inspectors as at 1 June 2007, this requirement was removed, though may be reinstated if the market led take up of HCRs is unsatisfactory for it to be a universally adopted part of the process.</p>
<p>The HIP, without a HCR, is very rarely likely to cost as much as £650, probably more like £400 in most cases &amp; this is all money that would need to be spent if it were the buyer getting the information together, after they had agreed to buy. And which would be wasted if they are unable to proceed for any reason (such as the chain of sales collapsing). The HIP does not have to be updated or &#8220;reassessed&#8221; every 3-6 months. The only requirement at the moment is that lenders require local searches to be no more than 3 months old, nothing else. This may remain the case but in future, updating searches if they are older will become very easy &amp; cheap through the electronic processes which will be available.</p>
<p>The concept of the HIP is plain common sense - when a transaction is usually part of a chain, it makes sense to remove as many pitfalls as possible from the process, by having the information up front. Far from being a deterrent to a seller, it should be seen as a valuable marketing tool the cost of which is saved on their related purchase &amp; which may save them a vast amount of hassle &amp; trauma, let alone possibly saving the whole chain from collapse. In the context of the overall costs of sale &amp; purchase, the need to commit to this relatively small cost, which you pay anyway on your purchase at present, is almost irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.051 seconds -->
